Jun 30, 2009

OLDBOY [2003]: Oh boy!

A 'that!' post...


As suppose to stylistics, reading Bordwell, Staiger, and Thompson's monumental The Classical Hollywood Cinema, i cannot suck in the significance of Park Chan-Wook's dizzying and perhaps the 'best style' from a Korean filmmaker. His approach is much of Hollywood meets Wong Kar-wai which i cannot stomach in the context of originality and ingenuity. No innovation at all, just a recycled bunch of ideas.

His frames, images below, extols a much mature aesthetics but not fully grown than his other Asian predecessors. Oldboy (2003) has a color palette not much of a high contrast but more normalize than Wong Kar-Wai's Happy Together (1997). I can see how much Wong's sense of space has dominated his mise-en-scene. But then Park Chan-Wook attempted to put contemporary devices on framing such as splitting the frames, shooting in wide-angle lens for distortions, staging in depth, deploying long takes, and using handheld camera movements to develop chaos and realism.

There is also a Kafkan element present. Note the illusion of the ants superimposed on the melancholia and alienation of both characters. If i could think clearly, he borrowed some thoughts on Dostoevksy's Note from Underground --- perhaps its parallelism to the imprisonment of Dae Su for fifteen years. This intertextual referencing is perhaps central to Oldboy. The stylize conglomeration of this textual sources made it an insoluble mass of art, definitely not an avant-garde but of mainstream specificity which i did not expect.

However, the thing is, honestly, i am intense in saying that he borrowed some of the montage elements from Chungking Express (1994). The Oldboy use of the calendar-type transition of time has the same function to the ones in Chungking Express. Anyway, i have to let my dissatisfaction simmer down and approach Oldboy in other aspects than this.

But i have to admit, his narrative construction is superb!


Ciaofck!

****



Jun 28, 2009

THE LAST EMPEROR [1987]

mise-en-scene pro!

I call Mr. Bernardo Bertolluci's The Last Emperor the most detailed and well-filmed mainstream cinema i have ever seen. His attention to detail and his sense of space is so much of an eye candy. I admire every bit of detail it exudes. The frames are oh so wonderful.

His approach to history is purposeful, declarative and enigmatic. He brought China to my eyes with a whole new vision. It is masterful art of cinema.


Ciaofck!

****

Jun 27, 2009

JIZZ IN MY PANTS: My Highest Point of Contemplation!

the 'MY LIFE IN 2:33 MINUTES' post...




An existential awakening.


Being the most boring blogger blogging the most boring films to watch, a.k.a. CONTEMPLATIVE CINEMA (with spatial and temporal tendencies to 'mundane reality'), it came to me, through FLICKHEAD, that 'the essence of my own humanity' is insignificant. Please do kill me with your Shakespearean dagger.

LOL!
***

Jun 25, 2009

FREE DOWNLOAD Andrei Rublev [1966] and The Mirror [1975]

super quick post...

[photos from here, here, here, and here]



A smile often leads to contemplation. (whatever Adrian!)


Because I am intensely connected with Andrei Tarkovsky oeuvre, I found out recently that Andrei Rublev, probably Tarkovsky's masterpiece, and The Mirror are viewable on YouTube through birubirFilms's Channel. They also provide download links to a Russian website for the full length film:


Andrei Rublev (download link)


The Mirror (download link)

Ciao for now!

***

I am busy with:


(i made it b&w to add contemplation, after all
university work is much of a contemplation than
entertainment.)


Ciaofck!

***

Jun 24, 2009

Saturation of Colors on THE DOUBLE LIFE OF VERONIQUE [1991]

photo post...


Cinematography is at its finest at Kieslowski's The Double Life of Veronique (1991).


Kieslowski has a different approach to mood. He uses an extensive variety of coloration and filters, sometimes to pull out green hues or to highlight the redness of the red light. Such is depicted by the series of images below and the one on top.


Ciao for now!

***

THE DUST OF TIME [2009]
a new film by Theo Angelopoulus





Trailer of The Dust of Time.

Theo Angelopoulus experiments with time. This premiered at this year's Berlin International Film Festival.

****


Jun 20, 2009

ANDREI TARKOVSKY: My Weekly Contemplation

snapshot post

[images from here, here and here]


Andrei Tarkovsky.

By reading an auteur study on Tarkovsky, it is, in a way, my method of opening my heart to contemplative cinema. The breadth of Tarkovsky's work is as absorbing as the book entitled Films by Andrei Tarkovsky: A Visual Fugue by Vida T. Johnson and Graham Petrie. I borrowed it from the library and i am much willing to make an effort to read it this week with enough enthusiasm to give honor to a director of contemplative cinema.

When one speak of an artist from Russia, i often think of my obsession with Russian writers (see ABOUT ME). Russians, a realization from reading Brothers Karamazov, are fond of contemplation, it seemed as though it is their fundamental way of life, their breather. Though Sergei Eisenstein may not be into long takes, still has contemplative tendencies especially in Battleship Potemkin (1925) due to the startling imagery Eisenstein employed.

Andrei Takovsky has a different approach to contemplation. His images are poetically charge, contrary to other contemplative artists who are obsessed with minimalism and the deconstruction of one's subject into mundane reality. One can look Tarkovsky similar to Kiarostami and Ozu: some few artists whose views in cinema are not only limited to the tenets of filmmaking but also to the concepts beyond this provocative regime. They often have a tendency to employ metaphysical overtones. Such is Kiarostami on The Wind will Carry Us (1999).

Kiarostami and Tarkovsky both has a unique eye for framing. Most of their frames are like visual paintings. In my previous post, Kiarostami identified Five (2003) much like painting. Some other directors have attempted to approach framing as a way of painting. No one cannot deny how the mise-en-scene of Wong Kar-Wai's Happy Together (1997) looked much like a painting, or maybe because it appealed that way.


Rembrandt's The Return of the Prodigal Son.


In the last scene at Tarkovsky's Solaris, at exactly 3:55 of the video clip below, one can say that this is Rembrandt. This is also observed by a certain youtube commentator mbmsv. Tarkovsky made a tangential appeal, almost a comparative analogy, to The Return of the Prodigal Son by Rembrandt. The video below manifests some of the most unforgetable and unique cinematographic techniques in cinema.



Last scene of Solaris.

***

I will visit the local videoteque tomorrow if i have time. I'm adjusting my blogging schedule, trying to fit it in between my hardcore chemical engineering studies, my PSYSC org work, and my UP Sorgogueños officer work (well, i'm glad to announce that i am the incumbent FINANCE OFFICER of the organization, wohoooo! Money come to me!)

***


Penelope waiting for ULYSSES.

I stopped reading ULYSSES! Too bad, i was at Episode 16. I will get back to it when i feel the urge.

***

Ciao!



Jun 15, 2009

THE MAN FROM LONDON [2007]; FIVE [2003]

prospective take...

[photos from here, here, and here]



The Trailer

Art is a bottomless pit of possibilities.

There is much to my mind right now. Basically, my thoughts are crowded by the structure of my criticism for Pulp Fiction (Tarantino, 1994), a bunch of film noir podcasts, a reflection on recently concluded 14th French Film Festival in Manila, some scattered thoughts on Alan Clarke and Andrei Tarkovsky, and my intense deep conversations with my conscience on my reflections on contemplative cinema. If there happens to be a primitive root to all this mixed up thoughts, and also if there is an element of derangement, it might have reached the peak after reading HarryTuttle's absorbing and informative article on the AVERAGE SHOT LENGTH (ASL) of contemporary contemplative films.

HarryTuttle's analysis has elevated me to:

(1) Euphoria: A sheer joy of having found Kiarostami's Five (2003) to have the longest average shot length of 14 minutes and 45 second (885 second of continuous shot via a steady camera). Five: Five Long Shots Dedicated to Yasujiro Ozu, the whole title of the film speaks of two subjects of unmistakable greatness: one, the Japanese cinema giant, Ozu, who gave us one of the most unforgettable and remarkable films of all time (i have to say that in high pitch!), Tokyo Story (1953); and two, the use of five long shots. Yes, Abbas Kiarostami filmed this meditative film in five long shots on an average of 14 minutes and 45 seconds and it can be simply broken down below into five images:




Shot One: A washed up piece of wood on the beach at the Caspian Sea


Shot Two: People Chatting up beside the beach, no dialogue still


Shot 3: A shot of dogs frolicking beside the beach


Shot Four: Ducks walking on the beach that moves from left to right of frame


Shot Five: A shot of the moon reflecting on the pond

There is much of a question of why did Kiarostami compose this non-narrative piece of art. The reception of the film to the critics have been favorable:

Robert Davis wrote:

"And you know what? It’s a nice piece of work. It’s the kind of movie that succeeds when you’re willing to let your mind wander the way it does when you watch clouds. Maybe you’ll close your eyes and just listen for a bit. Maybe you’ll nod off. I doubt if Kiarostami would object; he even said once that he enjoys movies that are so calm they make you sleepy but give you something to reflect on later." (here)

Kiarostami doesn't care, he said it outwardly, if the viewer would fall asleep while watching the film because it is made that way. The amount of contemplation rewards the viewer the calmness, i think, one can savor while watching the real waves of the ocean, as Jeff Anderson says. Phase9 have a more descriptive take on the film. Their review says:

"Despite the lack of a story, the films are far more than just pretty pictures: assembled in order, they comprise a kind of abstract or emotional narrative arc, which moves evocatively from separation and solitude to community, from motion to rest, near-silence to sound and song, light to darkness and back to light again, ending on a note of rebirth and regeneration. “An entire world is revealed to us”, Kiarostami says. “It’s a work that approaches poetry, painting. It let me escape from the obligation of narration and of the slavery of mise en scène." (here)
This poetic non-narrative film is my target for the month of June. If there is a possibility to watch this film in the local videoteque of my university, the University of the Philippines, i might as well stop this blog and head off to the UP Film Institute. If i could not access this one, i might consider the option of having a DVD delivered from Amazon.com to my doorstep.

Perhaps the question lingers, for the more or less 50 minutes of dazzling imagery, why did Kiarostami made it?



Video: Why did Kiarostami made this film?



Two essential videos on Five (2003):

A Scene from "Five dedicated to Ozu" [from firouzanFilms, link here]
Kiarostami on Making of Five [from haridasb, link here]




****


(2) Ecstasy: A coalesce of my growing fascination of Bela Tarr's cinema and my intense devotion to Pulp Fiction as neo-noir lead me to another film with the average shot length of 4 minutes and 24 seconds (284-second shot of a roving camera). Bela Tarr's recent feature, The Man from London (2007), achieves an ample amount of contemplation with film noir twist. This absorbing CC (contemporary contemplative) film follows a conventional film noir narrative and techniques, however, the most noticeable innovation that Tarr did was to let the camera movement and duration take it all. The cinematic technique is at its masterful zenith. The low-key lighting, high-contrast images dominated the film and has always been the most significant element of the noir. One can clearly see how much every element have been executed it in this clip:



A clip from The Man from London

This two filmic realizations remains an ache in my heart. I wonder when will i see all these films. I wonder and I am stuck.

***

Jun 12, 2009

ELEPHANT (Alan Clarke, 1988)

influences on contemporary contemplative cinema...

[photos from here and here]



Preparatory to my analysis for Gus Van Sant's Elephant (2003), I read a well written and focused article by Dan North on Alan Clarke's Elephant (1988) here. I searched youtube for the video or a clip and it was clear enough that this has been the source of Van Sant's contemplative masterpiece.




A clip from Elephant (1988)

On Van Sant's Elephant there is a notion of the extensive use of the steadycam as the primary source of movement. This technique is also noticeable in Alan Clarke's short film. I asked a question, why is this technique appropriate for the analysis, exploration and depiction of violence and mass killings? The thematic of both film revolves around mass violence. This seemed to be propelled in an almost dreamy movement of the camera locked in a moving trolley.

The steady camera - tracking shot approach is central to the stylistics of both films.

However, what are the other alternative options available for the two filmmakers to film both films?



(1) Handheld camera reminiscent of Michael Brault's Les Raquetteurs (1958) and any of Wong Kar-Wai's films.


Michael Brault's Les Raquetteurs (1958)

The object of contemplation will be lost, however, if the directors will pursue this cinematic style. It can be thought that hand-held cameras may depict the theme of violence recurring on both films with much accuracy because it can deploy much of the needed hastiness and immediacy of the gunner shooting a victim. It can also add a lot of psychological positioning as post-compositional effects. This style is common in art house cinemas especially in the independent waves in the 80s. Kurbrick did use a handheld camera when he filmed certain scenes in The Shinning (1980).


(2) A stationary camera on deep space with "Tarr-ian" effect



Deep space in Satantango (1993)

To film violence and to approach it in a realism mode of diegesis one can use the deep space extensively. To apply this approach to filming the themes explored by the two films, one can set a camera in a stationary position, set the lens in deep focus and let the characters move in front of the camera. In a way, the almost real time implementation of the action can create a realistic immediacy to the quality of the images.


The two alternatives are of the extremes of the spectrum of the stylistics of contemplative cinema. When Theo Angelopoulus crafted Eternity and a Day (1998) most of his frame compositions and cinematography were dominated by tracking shots from a long (not duration) shot to a medium shot on a gaily paced from deep focus to shallow focus, this characteristically long shots of Angelopoulus became a recurring technique on his predecessors and one cannot see why Van Sant cannot used this one. However, Van Sant's approach to Elephant was more of a Tarr than an Angelopoulus.

In the light of this filmic realizations, both the Elephant films have been much of an innovation than a recycling of techniques and one cannot discuss one without the other.

***

Jun 11, 2009

MORE KIAROSTAMI: RECESS (1972)

some pertinent videos...

[videos from faridb2000]

If one has an essential take for poetic cinema, one can never ignore Kiarostami.

//

Recess (1972) pt. 1

//

Recess (1972) pt. 2

Ciao!

****

Jun 10, 2009

What I am on on Film Studies?

just a rough snap shot...

[photos: my screen shots from Caligula (1979)]


"Oh my! Are you gonna kill me?"

I had a little change of taste lately. Because of my exceeding fascination on film criticism than on other aspects of my life like having a diet or engaging to activities like relationships and toning-up my body (honestly speaking haha!), i am actually learning really fast.


Some decent frames from Caligula

I actually did learn as much as i can take into for the past few weeks and my readings are mainly centered on David Bordwell's writings. I actually love his writings because: (1) it is the only thing accessible in the internet, though not all his works but an ample number; (2) he writes in this interesting intellectual way (duh! of course, Adrian! he's a film theorist) which i really admire ; (3) i am avid follower of the scholarly movement in criticism called Neoformalism.

I have been researching for this movement because of its unique approach to film. That, i will have to discuss in another post.

I have been focusing my research on my criticism for Pulp Fiction (Tarantino, 1994) and i am listening to the podcasts of PhD giants Shannon Clute and Richard Edwards on their discussions on the genre film noir. (here) I recently plugged about 30 podcasts in my iPod to listen to them talk when i am walking or just about to sleep.

I hope i never saw this film

Films i saw:

1) Caligula ("whatever director", 1979) - worst film i have ever seen
2) Ashes of Time Redux (Kar-wai, 2008)
3) Knife in the Water (Polanski, 1962)

***

ULYSSES




I'm at Episode 15: Circe and i am on the 3450th line of it and i think it goes on forever. Urgh! i don't want to start again from the beginning. i heavily depended on Harry Blamires' guide on Ulysses which is ass in a way because i don't read Joyce's fifteenth episode closely.


Anyway, good day!

***

Jun 9, 2009

Ma Saison Preferee (My Favorite Season, Techine, 1993)

a flash review: reflections



Emilie and Antoine

In the moment when i was sitting, for i was late for about fifteen minutes from the start of Andre Techine's Ma Saison Preferee, i was actually thinking of the coldness around and how it was reflected by the film which i, daresay, so strange, so personal and piercing i cannot imagine how i would write a flash review about it.

Sunday night, two days after the opening of the 14th French Film Festival in Manila, i sat there with a friend of mine in front of the theater.

Andre Techine and Ma Saison Preferee

Techine is a second batch of Cahiers du Cinema's critic-turned-prolific filmmaker . He is so talented, in context of Ma Saison Preferee, that i actually think he invented something potent to contribute in the drama genre.

Ma Saison Preferee (My Favorite Season) having received a great acclaim after being nominated for Palme d'Or last 1993 (the time when Jane Campion's The Piano and Chen Kaige's Farewell my Concubine won the palm) is a complex story about two siblings, Emilie, a provincial lawyer, and Antoine, a neurosurgeon, who are re-united to deal with the dread of their mother's stroke and future death.

During the course of my viewing i actually made notes of the stylistic techniques Techine used and to actually relate to the overall narrative of the film.


Cinematic Style

Mise-en-scene revolves around certain decor and landscapes which has an absurd bearing on color. On occasions, there have been an appeal to color which tend to be surrealistic and 'oppressed' or even less charged. For example, when the mother figure, Berthe fell down at the backyard of her house in Toulouse, a village in France, there was a POV shot composed in a medium close-up with a dark red berries that seemed to sway in the breeze. The significance of the scene demonstrates the tendencies of the film to appeal to images which are mundane yet expressionistic and even 'fantastical' somewhat illogical to progressive realism it tries to depict.

Techine did this perhaps to invoke the audience of the possibility of cinema to transform themes into numerous ways even if it leaps through illogical instances. These notable transformations can be achieve by destroying the coherence of the narrative, somewhat an anti-narrative device.

ON 'FANTASTICAL' SHOTS

The inclusion of 'fantastical' shots blended with the flow of the narrative was exhibited during the 4th episode (4: RETURN) when Emilie, sitting in lounge at Antoine's hospital, was in the process of accepting that her mother, Berthe, had a brain hemorrhage and was in the process of dying.



A clip from Ma Saison Preferee,
observe the 'fantastical' elements at work


There are three 'fantastical' elements shown:

(1) A stranger, probably a physician at the hospital, seduces her
(2) Talking to her mother and her father sitting beside the river
(3) The stranger had sexual intercourse with her on the bench beside the river

These three aspects are essentially relevant to the film's distinct spatio-temporal arrangement. These scenes are interlaced with the real diegetic world of Emilie but are significantly off-hooked because of its detachment to the flow of the narrative, as if these particular images are disruptions to the coherence of the story.

Why are these 'fantastical' elements significant and how are they achieved?

Excluding these 'fantastical' elements from the narrative, it is observable that Techine, employed mainly continuity editing. It is divided into four chapters temporally arrange it such a way to follow the struggle of the whole family from the announcement of Berthe's stroke to the death of Berthe. The temporal construction demands continuity editing, which is of course, in the historical context, a technique common in 90s French cinema drama. Hollywood 90s extensively use this editing primarily both in art cinemas and mainstream cinemas. Techine has in a way incorporated this technique by convention and has certainly appealed to these conventions as how drama filmmakers of that era did. However, Techine somewhat shifted this conventional use of continuity editing by incorporating these 'fantastical' elements, and has certainly challenged perspectives on it.

The placement of the 'fantastical' elements is narrative-motivated. It is perhaps notable to say that these images occurred during the times when Emilie is emotional and has been undergoing a lot of stress (her mother's sickness and her family's coldness to her). The element is placed significant to the narrative spatio-temporal inflections. This device is employed in reference to the character's mental state of mind, possibly the actualization of her thoughts and repressed feelings to here immediate surroundings.

The technique, 'fantastical' elements merged with the narrative to depict character's mind, has been employed throughout film history notably on the German Expressionistic era specifically on the film The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920). The use of 'fantastical' elements in Dr. Caligari are clearly of this mode, to depict the characters' state of mind during the emotional inflections of the narrative. However, in Dr. Caligari's usage, it was constructed mainly as a stylistic device from the experimentation of the filmmmakers in opposition to the realistic ventures of the conventional filmmaking in the 1920s silent era in Europe. The non realism element of the usage of this technique in the German Expressionistic era differentiates how Techine used it because he devised it in a realistic mode.

Because realism has been a noted mode on drama films. On a modern drama film, by convention, feelings are depicted externally through outward scenes of standard emotions such as the characters crying when distressed, laughing when jovial, frowning when anxious. Techine incorporated the 'fantastical' element to depict the same intention, the elucidation of the character's thoughts and emotions unconventional to modern drama films because of its non realistic appeal over a realistic narrative structure.

AN INNOVATION ON THE DRAMA GENRE

Techine, in his Ma Saison Preferee, has achieved an innovation on continuity editing in drama films and has effectively use 'fantastical' elements to show the complex emotional structure of his characters. Techine coherently melded it into the narrative and created a distinct style in storytelling, quiet reminiscent of the speaking dagger in Shakespeare's Macbeth.

I sat there inside the cinema amazed, if not euphoric, of how the film actually worked with its idiosyncratic and melodic techniques. And it did work well.

NOTE: Additional comments on other techniques shall be discussed later...
***

Noel Vera has a take on this (here).


Jun 8, 2009

Rush Hour (1970)

youtube gems

[source: BFI]





Rush Hour (1970)

This is a great example of a deep-focused, time-lapsed film which i totally adore. One cannot deny that this is a beautiful 3 minute short film.

***

From my notebook:


Theo Angelopoulus in his Eternity and a Day (1998) uses deep focus extensively. Is it symptomatic that all contemplative films has establish somewhat an extensive usage of this cinematic device? One can note also that in Bela Tarr's Satantango (1994) there is also an indiscreet usage of the device. Is it possible that the two major components of a contemplative film are, one, the extensive usage of deep focus and two, the duration of a long shot?

***

Jun 7, 2009

La Règle du jeu[1939]

a lesson in cinema



One has to put it that if one discusses Jean Renoir's masterpiece, La Règle du jeu (The Rules of the Game) he or she attempts to teach a lesson in cinema because the film is a lesso itself. The audience, as contemporary as myself, could possibly detain the technical merits of La Règle du jeu, and keep it as it is. But one must surely notice how Renoir used the depth of field in his depiction of life.

Renoir is not intense, but his elaborate use of wide-angle lens hints the audience his distinctive use of cinematic elements to depict the power of cinema to the world with a three-dimensional depth. The Rules of the Game present a remarkable usage of deep focus. This is to primarily emphasize that the world is not flat and static but a dynamic living system. Offscreen elements are as important as those which are located in the background. The space is stretched allthroughout the film. If i could only point to one contemporary film with such attention to detail in the mise-en-scene (Titanic perhaps, or Lord of the Rings), one could think La Règle du jeu is primordial to all that.

Complexity and technical brevity, in the backdrop of a growing cinema, La Règle du jeu is perhaps the most beautiful film i have ever seen.


A notable framing (Top)
Notice deep focus.


----

Most eminent usage of deep focus. (2 images below)


----


----

Renoir establishes a shallow focus
to contrast deep focus shots.


----


***



Jun 6, 2009

14th French Film Festival in Manila Opening

my snapshots



The 14th French Film Festival in Manila is officially open.


Some stars are there but basically it's a post-Cannes celebration for Dante Mendoza, Adolf Alix jr., and Raya Martin with them are distinguished guests most notably the French Ambassador to the Philippines, Thiery Borja de Mozota. Some media persons are also there.

I was at the back of everyone when i took these pictures. It's really hard to take a good shot from the back. But certainly it was a wonderful sight to see, if only i was invited.

Tomorrow, Cineplex 3, is open for the public's eye. One must have acquired tickets two hours prior the screening. So i must get there at around three o'clock tomorrow.

***





Jun 4, 2009

Encounters at the End of the World [2007]

vivisected images


Throughout the streams of photographic images (because essentially cinematography's central focus is photography) of Werner Herzog's documentary i had this queer idea of solitude being filmed in the most provocative way. The range of Herzog's color field, though monochromatic, captures certain moods and auras that i would never forget. Such is his application of post-production manipulation, perhaps laboratory work, on the film stock (is there a possibility that he used a digital one? Maybe) used. Some adjustments in contrast, and also a little less brightness these images would look exceedingly beautiful. But perhaps, this is the way our director works. A Werzogian (contracted name) method of film exposure to produce landscapes never before seen on film.

Werner Herzog attempts to tap on the modes of thinking of these people, to depict their own sense of humanity in living in Antarctica. And he did it by providing us austere yet vibrant pictures of the fullness and emptiness of life in Antarctica.

I was amazed that this haunting documentary is not at all a social commentary on climate change, or pervasive rhetorical gratuitousness on global warming but a picture of humanity itself in Antarctica.

Here are some handful screenshots for your viewing pleasure.


Humanity...


Mysticism...



Emptiness...

Rhythm...

***


ANNOUNCEMENTS:




14th French Film Festival in Manila


Shang Cineplex Cinema 3
Level 6, Shangri-La Plaza
Shaw Boulevard cor. EDSA
Mandaluyong City

FREE ADMISSIONS!!!

Showing:

ÇA BRULE (Claire Simon, 2006)

June 6, Saturday - 3:00 p.m.
June 8, Monday - 5:30 p.m.
June 10, Wednesday - 12:30 p.m.

LA PIANISTE (Michael Haneke, 2002)

June 11, Thursday - 8:00 p.m.


MARIE JO ET SES DEUX AMOURS (Robert Guédiguian, 2002)

June 7, Sunday - 3:00 p.m.
June 9, Tuesday - 3:00 p.m.

FLANDRES (Bruno Dumont, 2006)

June 7, Sunday - 5:30 p.m.
June 8, Monday - 3:30 p.m.
June 9, Tuesday - 5:30 p.m.
June 13, Saturday - 8:00 p.m.


UN SECRET (Claude Miller, 2007)

June 6, Saturday - 12:30 p.m.
June 10, Wednesday - 8:30 p.m.
June 14, Sunday - 12:30 p.m.


DIX-SEPT FOIS CECILE CASSARD (Christophe Honoré, 2002)

June 11, Thursday - 12:30 p.m.
June 13, Saturday - 3:00 p.m.

L’ESQUIVE (Abdellatif Kechiche, 2003)

June 11, Thursday - 5:30 p.m.
June 13, Saturday - 5:30 p.m.

HOME (Yann Arthus-Bertrand, 2009)

June 5, Friday - 7:30 p.m.
June 7, Sunday - 12:30 p.m.

JEAN DE LA FONTAINE (Daniel Vigne, 2007)

June 6, Saturday - 5:30 p.m.
June 9, Tuesday - 8:00 p.m.
June 14, Sunday - 3:00 p.m.

VAN GOGH (Maurice Pialat, 1991)

June 6, Saturday - 8:00 p.m.
June 8, Monday - 12:30 p.m.
June 10, Wednesday - 5:30 p.m.
June 14, Sunday - 8:00 p.m.

400 Coups (Francois Truffaut, 1959)

June 11, Thursday - 3:00 p.m.
June 14, Sunday - 5:30 p.m.

MA SAISON PREFEREE (André Téchiné, 1993)

June 7, Sunday - 8:00 p.m.

RIDICULE (Patrice Leconte, 1996)

June 13, Saturday - 12:30 p.m.

ZIM AND CO (Pierre Jolivet, 2005)

June 8, Monday - 8:00 p.m.
June 9, Tuesday - 12:30 p.m.


For the complete schedule of films check out their website here.


COMMENTS:

The list is largely made of contemporary films from great directors big and small. Only one from the French New Wave phenomena, The 400 Blows by Truffaut, made it which is not what i expected. I am practically most interested perhaps in watching three films notably Haneke's The Piano Teacher (LA PIANISTE), The 400 Blows by Truffaut, and also My Favorite Season by Andre Techine. But actually i am planning to watch all films.

See you in the festival!

Ciao!

***

Jun 3, 2009

BACK TO CIVILIZATION, AT LAST!

have a glass of vodka...



A decent Internet shop is 20 kilometers away from my home, who could live with that? In the middle of 62nd CANNES Film Festival i was drinking coffee and having a French kiss with my dog (a video will be added shortly after i upload it). When Mendoza won Prix de la Mise en Scene, i almost killed myself in front of my mother and father with a threat that if they do not avail a Globe Broadband (not that i hear good reviews from their service but i am desperate).

But the good thing is that:

(1) I am really moving to NEOFORMALIST, though i am still in darkness. After reading Bordwell's 'Historical Poetics of Cinema' (here) i knew i have found it, the part of film studies where i truly belong. One may notice that i haven't yet posted a formal and decent film critique in this blog. This is because i am still preparing for it. If there is a man in the house who doesn't subscribe to doctrine-centered approach to criticism, then i am that man. Frankly, Neoformalist is the only legitimate approach to film studies research. I cannot think of anyother way to approach one. I must transform into a POETICIAN within a week or i won't be able to escape this horrible dogmatic eccentricity surrounding recent film critics.

(2) I have settled in in my dormitory. I officially checked-in a while ago, around 5 o'clock, afternoon, of yesterday. No problemo except that a bunch of pertinent things are still at my uncle's place i better get sometime this week.

(3) I will get a FILM ELECTIVE this semester to boost up some aspects of my research. It could help a lot in my self-studies of cinema. I have great reviews from some of my friends regarding the introductory course to film offered to non-majors in the university. But i am a bit disappointed that i focuses only on NATIONAL CINEMAS and not on FILM HISTORY, specifically HISTORY OF CINEMATIC STYLES (which prompt me to think that i have to borrow Bordwell's [again!] book on this). How i wish to learn more on the Soviet Montage style and Ozu's great innovations, or Dreyer's framing. How i wish i could read more. But hey, i am a Chemical Engineering student by nature, so this is an issue of time management, an issue of peeking into Bazin's significant essays on cinema in between thermodynamic quantification and systems design analysis.

(4) My room is just two steps away from the wi-fi hotspot of the dormitory. I can pop up anytime between 5 PM to 7AM.

Okay! bye for now...

Ciao!

***