Showing posts with label ESSAYS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ESSAYS. Show all posts

WASAK 1 - Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives (2010)

...conversations on Cinema


---

---

TOPIC:
Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives (2010)
Date: January 10, 2011
Language Used: Filipino
Location: Starbucks, EDSA Shangri-la Mall
Guests: Sani Ajero and Epoy Deyto
Length: 16:17
Recording Device: Nokia Phone
Music: Acrophobia - Penguin Villa (OST - Uncle Boonmee)

Hallooo! Hallooo! Everyone! I'm sorry if the Top 100 Countdown was put into halt. For some reasons my academic life is taking toll of me, I'll be back this weekend if my thesis won't eat me.

WASAK! Conversations on Cinema

Wasak! Conversations on Cinema is my newest blog project. It aims to record conversations with local cinephiles, film festival friends, film critics, actors, and programmers on films. It follows a loose structured conversation with free-flowing thoughts about movies, politics, social issues, and people. The project is somewhat a merge of focused group discussion and podcast, but hopefully, it will transform into film podcast equivalent to high-quality film podcasts of Out of the Past: Investigating Film Noir and GreenCine Daily Podcast.

WASAK 1 - Uncle Boonmee (2010) is a conversation with two of my closest cinephile friends Epoy and Sani about a film by Apichatpong "Joe" Weerasethakul, Uncle Boonmee..., which claimed the highest prize in Cannes Film Festival last year, Palme d'Or. It sort of focused on the imagery used in the film in relation to Joe's other films and political content of the film. Transcript of the interview will be provided soon in both English and Filipino.




Enjoy!

Ciao!
*****

TWELVE GIFTS TO CINEMA

...twelve essays on twelve memorable film experiences this year...


Dearest readers, I welcome you all to another year-end special of AUDITOIRE: Twelve Gifts to Cinema! In the spirit of Christmas, Auditoire has written twelve film essays celebrating another year of a memorable encounter with cinema. This year's top 12 films were carefully chosen from a pool of 100+ films watched by Auditoire from January 1, 2010 to December 25, 2010. The twelve films are historically variant chosen from different eras possessing different styles and different approach to filmmaking. This is to introduce the readers to variety and heterogeneity of cinema in form and style and to produce detailed essays to guide each film enthusiast in the aesthetic and thematic issues of each film. The series will begin tomorrow and end until January 2011.

TWELVE GIFTS TO CINEMA

1 |

2 |

3 |

4 |

5 |

6 |

7 |

8 |

9 |

10 |

11 |


12 |



Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!





Ciao!
****


Freewriting #1



Freewriting #1
Photo credit to this site(click here!)



Warning: This is an attempt to cure my very depressing writer's block and some people will be mentioned here. My opinions on them should not be taken personally for i do not intend to hurt them. Moreover, I am sorry if I unintentionally hurt your feelings. Sorry! Sorry! Sorry!



TO be honest i hate my semester this semester, i don't know maybe because of this drastic change that happened in my blog. though i knew that this is what i like, i don't get the feeling of it. i don't get the hang of it. I do not talk any more about the films the i watch, noGRILLED posts, or a topic about the medium. i wish, and only wish, to be the same again. BAd start! Bar start!

What is this pestilence that i am having, a weird concussion on my head, on my groin, on my body. Is it physical pain? the way Dr. Mischief describes it, tantalizing pain? I wish i cna be more spontaneous! more spontaneous, that is!

I know that being a male person, on gender, entails a lot of peculiarities like not so spontaneous. And the girl, the girly girl gets the prize for being more spontaneous than a guy! Well what the heck! Girls, they don't have the guts to go through hard stuffs in life. It maybe fair, gender-wise that a male individual is given a less spontaneous mind and a girl a less structured flow of ides.

I hope i can be a writer. A good writer for all in the world. i am in the process of creating a great character, actually two characters, Leonard and Marcus on my novel. I keep notes. marvin tamayao knows this, he read some of my notes on the my character development and i make sure he gave me a comment on it, not just a comment but a good criticism of their persona. How will i take their insecurities, make them flesh out, flesh out from the book and into the reader's mind so that they will actually believe them, and considers them purely realistic. I am a very curious how marcus, my very bold marcus would turn into. he is the dark force. The anti-hero. Every reader will disgusts him, some may emulate his carnal, psychopathic desires, some may curse him to be brought into the world. The idea of Marcus elludes me more than the idea of Leonard. leonard will be considerably frail, he will be frail and fragile. Weak. discontent. but he will be the hero.

But how am i suppose to plunge him into the heroic stance. A heroic battle? A heroic deed? A heroic canvass of events that largely depict leonard as the big deal, big guy, big fame. But he will be sad, which made it terribly deficult to create him. to flesh him out. to draw him to the reader. It would be very boring for the audience to read a very sad beginning. so i made a lot of changes from my first draft, looking for pitch, high enough to make it like an expanded epistle of Shakespeare.

There are loads in my thoughts that i need to dislodge before i could think of my two major characters who will be playing the chracters in my novel. Since fifteen, i was only positive that i have one character, leonard. But then, i thought, i should have two characters to point out dichotomies of human life, human existence and human fate. it is but a dichotomy, a dichotomy that is filled with wholeness, wholeness of a being, of a human beings. For there shall be one, one Mr. Cervantes, one Mr. Cervantes who will not be Leonard, nor marcus, nor Celia, nor Clarissa but he will be whole. it is the wholeness of human character that i wish to play. It will not harbor a great memory from me, but more of a perspective about human character, how it grows, how it dies, how it disinterest and interest, how it purge the incapacities of the human mind.

i felt anxious. anxiety eats me like worm, a vermin of hell, it freaks me out. It freaks the hell out of me. Maybe this is the beginning of this blockage, the trapping of the soul, the capsized destructon of the temple of my writing. I must be able to overcome this fretting obstacle. I must, i must.

i am must go into the lightness of me, find happiness, not just external happiness, but a happiness that has meaning and essence. so i bought Blaise Pascal's, HUMAN HAPPINESS essay just this afternoon at Fully booked. i hope it could make me understand my condition.

does virginia ever felt this blockage of creative energy?

Ever since she was twelve years old, she kept a diary until her suicidal death last 1941.

I remember making an essay about her and titled it, VIRGINIA's LOVER.

I have seen some good films lately, and have experience a momentus feeling of parading the mall of Trinoma at 9 o'clock PM with a purchased VAN HEUNSEN violet solid colored shirt, and a leather bag, i am very happy about it. I am almost estatic to use them so this day i went to SM North, aside from fishing for a first sentence for my essay in English 10, to wear them. I must say that i love them, i love my leather bag. i love the violet solid colored shirt. I must say that i am satisfied with them, with everything. with the humming of my heart as i drink my caramel machiatto at Starbucks a while ago, the way it enters my body, makes me feel hot, feel dislodged. Feel estatic, undefinable.

i think i am sleepy, i am getting drunk of words, drunk of the pain of not creating art, of having a bad taste.

What is this thing inside of me, a virus or something? like the virus in Naked Lunch(movie). A vermin. A hermit crab with large pinchers. I see that my eyes are closing and my confidence dropping, dropping, tik tik tik tik tik tik tik tik tik .... i wanted to hear the sounds of nature, the paddling of the sea, the waves, the wind, the rasping of the leaves of the mint and the mango tress, the pure insolent shriek of the baby on the neighboring houses, the voice of my mother calling me, the voice of my father.

I am alone in my room, isolated, untouched. I must feel alive. Feel free again, i must go on jogging tomorrow... i must wake up at six and jog. and jog, jog jog jog jog jog jog!

wikipedia says it oxygenates my blood. i hope nikko would come with me, or with carl maybe, i have no one to come with me. though, i jogged alone, i must have someone with me, talked to them, to exchange with them my thought on philosophy and minute details of my plans for the day, or the snorts of Manuel, or the quirks of Melbert, or my bisexual classmate at my _____ subject, or the Plurk things, the goodness of it, the disavantages of it, the theory of knowledge of Bertrand Russell, or my film studies' research, or this blog, this blog, this blog, this ultimate part of me, indespensable and true. I could be having a dream, a good dream tonight, cause i have released this freewriten thought from me to this blog about films and life. Film and life are a good combination, personal and film, it makes film a more legitimate form of art if there shall be a personal attachment to it to those who criticizes it, it forms a bond ot the individual like milk and honey, or stone and river, or eath and sky. A great bond, forever true.

I must sleep now!





DEVELOPMENT OF A NATION: A PERSONAL CHOICE


DEVELOPMENT OF A NATION:
A PERSONAL CHOICE

by Adrian Mendizabal
September 24, 2008






OMG! ang haba ng letter! i just finished reading it... It so comprehensive, tackling a lot of issues both of the university and of the Filipino nation. But then i thought, W. SyCip is attacking a singular character! And after rereading it again, yes, he is talking about the Filipino as a symbolism of a nation. This nation, he defines, is a rather vague, unarguably full of contradictions and on the verge of extinction. However, there is no such thing as an extinction of a nation.

Human beings constituting a nation, in it's most fundamental form, are not limited by time. Of this post-modern age where technology is 'speeding' up almost literally every constituent of life to achieve it's full form or purpose, time is not limiting factor of human beings. Yes, we are behind among Asian countries rise for development. On a more acceptable level, a Filipino, generally speaking, is less developed than other Asian countryman, but this is not because we are running out of time. What is this race that we are joining into with other Asian countries? Is this race heading for that ultimate validation that we in ourselves can be considered a developed country? What is then development?

These questions involves not only the fundamental laws of governance but, for me, are questions to the fundamental laws of us, as human beings. If there is a race, then time seems to be halting us from achieving that ultimate goal. But this is not truthfully and absolutely so. Human beings are limited by their nature and tendencies. In other words, the development of a nation does not depends on issues of time, but to the issues of Filipino character that every countryman has.

The development of nation, for me, is a personal, humanistic choice that every countryman must make. it is in itself, a personal issue. Human nature is not something that we are born with, it is not even genetic. It is learned. It is shaped by education. The process of acquiring the nature that, we in ourselves have, started when we are taught by our parents the rudimentaty themes of life. It begins with color. Then with pictures, and followed by the acquisitions of numbers, symbols. And then we went into the stage of applying or realizing that this forms are forms of truth. This cognitive process programs our understanding of our world, it also recalls humanistic themes such as love, hatred, regret, happiness, sadness, dread that we have accessed before we are born. Thus, the development of a nation wholly depends on the education or knowledge of each individual citizens.

Education is most important. Without education, there would be no language to facilitate susceptibilty to various forms of tribulations.

Philippines is not suffering because of the lack of time in achieving its goals. Let us not look at our nation as a car racing with other nations for ultimate development. There is even no such thing as an ultimately developed nation (Utopia). The same as there is so such thing as an ideal man. We see our country as ourselves. We must enveloped ourselves not as separate views but we must see ourselves as the nation itself. The reason why we don't prosper as nation because we see ourselves in other nations identity. What is really a Filipino identity? We have to view ourselves as unique and identifiable citizens, in order for our country to stand on its own. This is a social and a personal responsibility.

Living in a country is more of an internal struggle than an external one.

Then what are we looking for all this time?

Haven't you realize it yet?

- yes, it is happiness. Happiness is a much more strange word for me than mystery. Happiness comes in many packages and in a unexpected ways. But, take note, that happiness is not freedom. Freedom is not a matter of choice but a matter of want. But happiness is a choice. If we look at ourselves, a self-image of nation, as not happy, we end up being sad.

The way we think about ourselves in inevitably reflected in our faces. We cannot hide our shame. We cannot hide our sadness. We cannot hide our happiness. If there are people who can do that, there are themselves unhappy people living unhappy lives. Our nation, as we look at it more of ourselves, is reflects a dismal, unlivable space. Is this what we feel right know? Is this what other people feel about themselves all their lives? Are we really empty-hearted citizens of our country? We, must begin a quest. and this is a quest for happiness.

happiness is more of cooperative than individualistic. If a person wanted to be happy all by himself, then by default, he is unhappy. happiness is shared by every people. Every human beings love each other. And we love other beings. We even love non-beings like stones. (Murdoch). We are capable of happiness if we share them with others like us.

To be good is to be happy. Good is ethically bounded. Therefore, happiness is an ethical term. Happiness is not achieve by acts of morality alone. Moral conduct is in itself a way of achieving such happiness. but that is not the most important purpose of life. A good life is a life that is simply satisfying. Simplicity is not a key word here, but satisfying. The means for satisfaction must be guided by the acts of morality. Simplicity is not a term that considers a life lived with simple things, ordinariness because such things are short lived and temporary. Simplicity refers to the level of understanding that a human must have --- and that level corresponds to the lowest level. Simply satisfying refers to understanding moral life like a child. This does not implicate that we should have a childish perspective on viewing our actions as good or bad. This, however, implies that we should view moral life as simple as a child understanding of right and wrong. For example, a child knows that lying is bad, whereas, in an adult perspective, a lie can be categorized into multifarious forms.

Happiness is leading a simply satisfying moral life.

If this is what we see in ourselves, if this what we envisioned in ourselves as human beings, the nation that we hold in ourselves shall bear fruits of development. Our nation is even more connected to us than we could ever think of. Philippines is in every heart of every Filipino citizen. It is, itself, the citizens.


Originally made(fresh with grammatical errors) by:
Adrian D. Mendizabal
2006 - 41324
B.S. Chemical Engineering
email me:
lessegers@yahoo.com
adrian.lessegers@gmail.com
see my blog, i posted this reply and the letter:
http://adrianmendizabal.blogspot.com Click! Click! Click!