Showing posts with label The 500 Film Challege. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The 500 Film Challege. Show all posts

The King's Speech (2010)



Call it a film that practices restraint against other possible creative routes in filmmaking, or a film that conforms to filmic conventions, The King's Speech draws audiences from all walks of life because it is a performance film by its nature. Similar to many other performance spectacle in the world the story has simple and funny premise dramatize at different The King or Berty, played by Colin Firth, aims to deliver a speech astutely to an audience without stammering. He was helped by an 'experience-wised' speech therapist, Lionel played Geoffrey Rush. The mentoring sessions flowed rhythmically because of the beautiful dialogue between the two characters chronicling the incapacity and tension of the King in achieving the suitable speech conditions for public speaking.

The linearity of the story is accentuated with good visual design using wide-angle lens motifs to emphasize the emotional struggle the King is having with himself. The King's Speech' stylized cinematographic use of imbalance framing wherein characters are framed far right from the usual framing offers new perceptual routes for the viewers. The King's Speech's editing is both also notable primarily because it uses axial editing wherein violations of the 180-degree rule results to a fair amount of complexity in it structure as compared to the usual shot-reverse shot orientation. (catch it at Tesco)

This is the take off point of The King's Speech with respect to David Fincher's The Social Network (2010). Both are talkies, and both use the force of the editing to harness the rhythmic dynamics of the dialogue as it glides from person to person. But The King's Speech's eclectic balance in both cinematography and editing surprisingly gave the film a far more superior tone than The Social Network (2010). To close this The King's Speech is supple, simple and aesthetically finesse. But I would measure that praise by saying to what occurred to me the lack of insight into the human soul of the character of the King. Perhaps maybe this is the reason why the film seems theatrical and bouncy.


Ciao!
****


Ars Colonia (Raya Martin, 2011)

...and there you go!



Ars Colonia (2011)

Ars Colonia is a one-minute film by Raya Martin submitted for International Film Festival Rotterdam 2011 supported by Hubert Bals Fund. Raya Martin, one of the leading experimental filmmakers has a piquant style on long takes, the use of the video medium and stylized mise-en-scene. Ars Colonia, shot in Hi-8 camera and blown up in 35 mm, is obviously a visual film since its central rhetoric is based on images. It is an abstract film by all facets because it offers new ways of seeing things.

The technique of coloring a 35-mm celluloid is quite old. It has been used several times by many experimental filmmakers like Stan Brakhage in his Thigh Line Lyre Triangular (1961) [wiki] and J. J. Murphy's Print Generation (1973-74). Possibly, the origin of this style is the strong influence of Brakhage to Raya. The icons used in the film have strong alignment to Martin's historical mode of filmmaking which he started with Maicling Pelicula ng Indio Nacional (2005). In an attempt to draw the lost years of Philippine Cinema's silent era, he made a series of films that ascribe to silent film aesthetics; with Independencia (2009) as the most faithful to tableau staging and mise-en-scene.

With Ars Colonia he forges a new way to look at historical elements. Let us do a rough close analysis of these elements.

Frame by Frame


We are initially drawn to this man wearing a metal cap, possibly a soldier. The mise-en-scene is instantly displayed and we can infer by intuition that this is a man walking in sea water with islands around him. The film is shot in sepia tone using Hi-8 camera and blown-up and fast-forwarded in celluloid set in 'lomo' conditions. In its monotonal look, Martin transforms it into an highly stylized visual display.

On the above three screenshots, an observable change in the color of the sky from yellow to orange to read. The color of the sea remains dark blue. This suggest Martin's motivation in color and spatial differences. As we know, abstract films are motivated by form more than narrative. The offer new visions of old mise-en-scene. As with this one, Martin explores colors of the sky, using a pen-marker he etched it and somehow its speed is increase. It can be politically motivated, at one level wherein colors are used to indicate symbolic associations as with red to socialism or communism and yellow to the Aquino government. These associations can be results of over-interpretation, a hermeneutic limitation among us humans to judge visual cues based on personal biases and prejudices. However, this is not a discouraged path to take. This is often a result of our process of meaning-making out of these signs-and-symbols.

As with the above screenshots, there is an intent on exploring new ways to look at the island. The island transgresses from an ordinary-looking island with false-colored sky surrounded by murky blue water into bounded color-gradients with hints of its size and shape. This is the destruction of the concept of island in Ars Colonia. A cinematic moment called the death of subject wherein its concept metamorphose into other forms. As in the next shots, the island transforms into non-rigid color-effects similar to fireworks and explosions in the battlefield. The death of the subject is, of course, a postmodern bent which can be traced to Jean-Luc Godard's Un Femme est Une Femme (1961) and many other experiments in form.

Ars Colonia comes not from the surrealism trend which can be traced from Maya Deren's Meshes of the Afternoon (1945), Luis Bunuel's Un Chien Andalou (1929) but this can be traced from the works of Jackson Pollock, Ed Munch and many other abstract expressionists only that the expressionism in Ars Colonia is portrayed in 35-mm. The method of coloring the celluloid is historically motivated by these arts trends.

Lodging away from these aestheticism, we can infer so many allusions from the film. Questions like, is the island representative of the Philippines? Is the film about the death of the concept of being Filipino? What other hermeneutic lines can be drawn? Infinitely, we infer, ask and imply many associational aspects from the film. It offers numerous non-point concepts making it one good example of a postmodern film.

Ciao!
****

Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)





Rating: 4/5

Kill if you can but I love Never Let Me Go (2010). After knowing it received mixed reviews both from Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic, I was never swayed to change camps. I love the film mostly because it uses depth to alienate a characters (see pictures above) and it uses cuts to box two different sets (see pictures below). With this fairly simple aesthetics, it narrates a lonely story of a group of friends in their failure to survive life itself. It is almost a contemplative stark, quiet similar to many movies by French directors and Asian directors i.e. with Edward Yang and Hou Hsiao-Hsien in their use of depth cues. This film deserves a re-evaluation.


for Alexis Tioseco (1981-2008)

Ciao!
***

The 500 Film Challenge


Yes, you read it right, 500 Films in a year. Princess Kinoc is the brainchild of the project. From her introductory entry, the project was inspired by the movie Julie and Julia (2009) which was about a food blogger on her quest to cook every recipe in Julia Child's Mastering the Art of French Cooking (1961). If Ebert watched 450 films last 2009 according to his Yearend Reviews Book 2009 and Jay-r around 400 films, then I think it's doable. I've watched 200+ feature films last year excluding, of course, the many, many short films I've watched during weekends and holidays. So here are the rules for the challenge:

1 | Accept the dare by making a comment on this post or you can email me: adrian.lessegers@gmail.com. Anyone with a blog is eligible.

2 | Make an introductory post using the beautiful Anna Karina picture above explaining the project. Link all the participants of the project in the post as shown below (scroll down).

3 | Start watching 500 films and write about each one of them. Short films, feature films and extra-long films are accepted. Miniseries are allowed i.e. Carlos (2010), The Decalogue (1988) but major series are not. As long as you watched them after you accepted the dare its okay. So you cannot include films you watched before you have officially accepted the dare.

4 | You cannot repeat a film. Of course, duh!

5 | The first one to finish the project will have a special prize (to be announced before the year ends).

PARTICIPANTS:

1.) Princess Kinoc (http://underthefiretree24.wordpress.com)
2.) Jay-R Trinidad (http://pinoyfilmzealot.wordpress.com)
3.) Adrian Mendizabal (http://adrianmendizabal.blogspot.com)
4.) Epoy Deyto (http://kawtskamote.blogspot.com)
5.) Dodo Dayao (http://pelikula.blogspot.com)
6.) Clem Malubay (http://whatclemsaid.livejournal.com)
7.) Carl Joseph Papa (http://whatevercarl.tumblr.com)
8.) Nilhenwen (http://nilhenwen.livejournal.com)
9.) Etchie Pingol (http://etchieblog.wordpress.com)
10.) Sani Ajero (http://sanriel.wordpress.com)
11.) Paolo Barazon (http://titopao.com)
12.) NiƱa Domingo (http://ninsydipsy.tumblr.com)
13.) Jay Rosas (http://jayclopsz.blogspot.com)
14.) Minamic (http://casualcontrary.blogspot.com)
15.) Katie Agones (http://mbandm.wordpress.com)
16.) Vince Dawes (http://shaved-ape.livejournal.com)
17.) Whammy Alcazaren (http://softcorecatalogue.wordpress.com)
18.) Dimitra Evm (http://whataliceforgot.blogspot.com)
19.) Jess Printup (http://midakba.tumblr.com)
20.) Ainslee (http://cupcakesforainslee.blogspot.com)
21.) perfectlylonelysoul (http://perfectlylonelysoul.wordpress.com)
22.) Flamire (http://flamire.blogspot.com)
23.) Neil (http://www.allmovies.asia)

If you want to join, just alert me in anyway. Contact me here.

Let the challenge begin!

Ciao!
****